Home Blog Page 135

Injustices vs a man who fought for social justice

0

Like many other militant activists since the Marcos dictatorship, Randall Echanis survived repeated acts of injustice against his person, by state authorities and military/police agents. Until his brutal murder in a small rented apartment in Novaliches, Quezon City, past midnight on Aug. 10.

No, that’s not quite a precise statement. Because even after death, his cold body in a coffin, Randall and his grieving family were treated with gross disrespect by Quezon City police investigators.

When he was killed, Randall Echanis, 71, was the chairman of Anakpawis (a party-list group for peasants and workers), deputy secretary general of Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas. Since 2002, he had been a peace consultant of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines in the GRP-NDFP peace talks. He had been arrested and detained under three administrations: the Marcos dictatorship, Corazon Aquino and Gloria Arroyo.

His body, shot and stabbed, and that of his neighbor Louie Tagapia, were both found in his apartment. A witness, also a neighbor, was awakened by the noise in Randall’s room and saw at least five men leaving the place.

Per newspaper accounts, the police first brought Randall’s body to the Pink Petals Memorial Homes in La Loma. After his widow Erlinda identified his body she had it transferred to St. Peter’s Memorial Chapel on Commonwealth Avenue. But that very night the police “forcibly seized” his body and returned it to Pink Petals, purportedly to verify his identity, telling his family to produce evidence such as fingerprints or DNA test results.

Only on Wednesday did the police finally return Randall to his family. QCPD chief Maj. Gen. Ronnie Montejo told reporters the body’s right thumb print matched with that on his ID card issued by Brgy. Aguho in Pateros. Did they need to retrieve, transfer and hold the body for two days just to get that thumb print? Couldn’t they have done that at St. Peter’s Memorial Chapel?

More pain was inflicted on Randall’s family by Gen. Montejo and his chief investigator, Maj. Elmer Monsalve. The two said they were pursuing the idea that the killings could have been done either by “akyat bahay” armed robbers or people with a personal grudge against Tagapia – rendering Randall’s death a sort of “collateral damage.”

The leader’s colleagues in Anakpawis, KMP and other allies believe the killings were the handiwork of state security forces and that Randall Echanis was targeted. Rejecting both the QCPD line and its investigation, they called for investigation by the Commission on Human Rights or by independent and impartial bodies.

The Public Interest Law Center (PILC) and the National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL), which both have served as legal consultants of the NDFP negotiating panel in the GRP-NDFP peace talks, look at Randall’s murder from that perspective.

The PILC pointed out that President Duterte’s termination of the peace talks through Proclamation 360 in November 2017 was followed by a spike in threats to peace consultants like Echanis.

“Threats to his security heightened. Randall was ceaselessly hounded by threats of arrest and renewed prosecution,” it said. “The Office of the Solicitor General sought to cancel his bail granted by the Supreme Court in 2012. Fears for Randall’s life and security became paramount as Duterte intensified his attacks – both verbal tirades and active orchestration, against peace consultants and leaders of progressive groups,” PILC said.

It recalled the 2019 murder of Randy Malayao, another NDF peace consultant, who was shot in the head while sleeping inside a bus in Nueva Vizcaya. The killing of Echanis must not be allowed to pass bearing the same “suspicious” marks of cover-up and impunity, PILC said.

“Are we totally and almost irretrievably shutting the doors and windows of a potential peaceful resolution of the perennial ills of society by sowing terror and trepidation among those who present alternative solutions?” cried NUPL president Edre Olalia. “Where will the people go thence for their legal struggles if they are not welcome?”

Olalia further called attention to the death of Julius Giron, killed by the military only last March in Baguio City. Giron held an identification document issued by the NDFP under the 1995 Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees. Like Echanis, ailing and unarmed, Giron was brutally killed at home; that time, the military owned the killing.

“How bad can it get?” Olalia lamented. “How…can we encourage people to openly and effectively engage in legitimate causes and advocacies for social and economic reforms if you can treacherously silence them?”

On its part, the Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG), headed by human rights lawyer Jose Manuel “Chel” Diokno, declared that an “extrajudicial killing” had been carried out, since the two victims were not doing anything illegal that would have necessitated the use of force. The killing, it added, was a “cruel, inhuman and degrading act.”

Two other comments on Randall’s murder are worth quoting:

Sen. Risa Hontiveros, who as a former GRP peace panel member had faced Randall on the negotiating table, recalled: “Such a gentle person, while a fighter. Nakakaiyak, nakakagalit. This is cold-blooded murder.”

Veteran journalist Ma. Ceres Doyo, in her Inquirer column last Thursday, wrote in part: “Echanis was a political figure. [His killing]… is something out of the box. ‘A new modus,’ a ‘new format,’ said those who have yet to find words for it…. Murder it definitely was, but no doubt also an assassination. The intent to kill was obvious. Assassination differs from murder in that the former has to do with the killing of a known figure and especially if politics played in it. Like the assassination of Ninoy Aquino.

“Echanis died of multiple stab wounds. It was an assassination by multiple stabbing. (Why do I suddenly recall President Duterte talking about using bayonets? In this day and age.)”

* * *

Email: satur.ocampo@gmail.com

Published in Philippine Star
August 15, 2020

The post Injustices vs a man who fought for social justice appeared first on Bulatlat.

80 new cases, total of 5,898 COVID-19 cases among health workers as of August 14

0

The Department of Health (DOH) Beat COVID-19 Philippine Situationer with data as of August 14 recorded 80 new COVID-19 cases in a day among health workers, bringing the total to 5,898. The DOH also reported 838 active cases among health workers, reporting 61 cases more than yesterday. Of the active cases, 2 are critical, 4 severe, 615 […]

The post 80 new cases, total of 5,898 COVID-19 cases among health workers as of August 14 appeared first on Manila Today.

Balik-Tanaw | Pentecost: The Unshakeable Faith of the Canaanite Woman

0

BY DEACONESS ANGIE BOLINAS-BRONCANO, PhD
United Methodist Church

Psalm 67:2-3, 5, 6, 8

Isaiah 56:1, 6-7

Romans 11:13-15, 29-32

Matt 15:21-28

The Unshakeable Faith of the Canaanite Woman

I. The Context

Jesus has entered Tyre and Sidon after his encounter with the Pharisees and the scribes who were consistently rejecting him. On his way, he met the Canaanite woman. In the Book of Deuteronomy, the Canaanites were known for their pagan and corrupt practices. Their presence in the land was perceived as a threat to Israel’s religion and morality. Now, Jesus was getting known in the region because of his remarkable deeds. So, the Canaanite woman would somehow know who Jesus is. The woman came crying out to Jesus. “Lord and Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.” (15:22) Jesus did not say a word but the Canaanite woman kept following and begging for mercy for her daughter’s healing. Jesus did not send her away although the disciples were already annoyed asking Jesus to send her away. As a Canaanite woman, she is considered an unclean outsider and an old enemy of Israel. But her situation did not discourage her from approaching Jesus. Her persistence made Jesus respond twice. First, he explains to her that his mission is first to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (15:24). Jesus wanted the disciples and the woman to understand fully that His ministry in the short time he had on earth was very focused on Israel. On her second cry for help, the woman knelt and begged Jesus to help her. This time, Jesus likens her Gentile status to the small pet dogs who long to be fed from the table (15:26). In a short saying, the Jews are the “children” and the Gentiles are the “dogs” The children get fed first. Nonetheless, the woman’s response was very sharp and straightforward. She accepts the status of a family’s dog where even puppies enjoy crumbs from their owner’s table (15:27). The Canaanite woman was claiming a place in the household even though she is an outsider. The woman knew that the Messiah came to Israel first and all she could do is to ask for mercy as a non-Israelite. The woman explicitly engages Jesus of existing social divide of inclusion and exclusion. While her persevering attitude magnifies her understanding of Jesus’ true identity as the Messiah she did not stop there. Believing in Jesus and in his power to heal her daughter, she got out of her cultural boundaries and claim her rightful position even if she was an outcast. Her ultimate hope of receiving God’s mercy and grace was fully realized.

II. The Unshakeable Faith of the Canaanite Woman

The Jews rejected Jesus, but the Gentiles accepted him. And this time Jesus responded with emotion: “Dear woman, you really do have a lot of faith…” Her faith was rewarded. Her daughter got healed. The Canaanite woman is a clear example of how an ordinary, simple, poor, and outcast woman can be included in the Lord’s table. No restrictions, no rejection, no boundaries of what Jesus can do even to the least of his sisters, that salvation is for everyone. But the religious leaders who were blinded by their arrogance and greed for power, has rejected Jesus and failed to recognize the need for their own salvation. How many of our leaders in our times have rejected, ignored, and even ridiculed God’s offer of salvation, healing, restoration, and reconciliation? Many of our leaders wallow in luxury depriving the poor and those in the margins, the basic needs for food, shelter, jobs, health care, and education.

The reality of the pandemic only exposes the viciousness, the corruption, and indifference of our leaders. Worst, they took advantage of the pandemic to amass more wealth, abuse their authority, show their sheer negligence and apathy to the people’s welfare and well-being, and their utmost disregard for civil liberties and human rights.

Just like the Canaanite woman, women of today do not just accept their unmerited sacrifices and miseries and would not take their dehumanizing situation silently, especially if they are losing their children and their loved ones in a very inhuman way. They are moving forward, breaking boundaries of gender and cultural stereotypes, and seeking peace, justice, the security of food and jobs, safety of our children, and the well-being of others.

The faith of the Canaanite woman gives us hope that God’s work is not yet finished. That we as a church need to take the message of grace to the world, to people who are seeking salvation and mercy. Our prophetic tasks continue. God listens to our prayers and petitions. Our government is subject to God’s authority and therefore, accountable to God and God’s people. The Kairos moment will come when “God will drag strong rulers from their thrones and sends the rich away with nothing” (Luke 1:52:53).

As Jesus said, “Oh, woman, your faith is something else. What you want is what you get.” (Bulatlat.com)

Balik-Tanaw is a group blog of Promotion of Church People’s Response. The Lectionary Gospel reflection is an invitation for meditation, contemplation, and action. As we nurture our faith by committing ourselves to journey with the people, we also wish to nourish the perspective coming from the point of view of hope and struggle of the people. It is our constant longing that even as crisis intensifies, the faithful will continue to strengthen their commitment to love God and our neighbor by being one with the people in their dreams and aspirations. The Title of the Lectionary Reflection would be Balik –Tanaw , isang PAGNINILAY . It is about looking back (balik) or revisiting the narratives and stories from the Biblical text and seeing ,reading, and reflecting on these with the current context (tanaw).

The post Balik-Tanaw | Pentecost: The Unshakeable Faith of the Canaanite Woman appeared first on Bulatlat.

Rights group want independent probe on Echanis’ murder

0

Human rights groups condemn the killing of peasant leader and peace consultant Randall Echanis, as they call for an independent probe on his murder.

Karapatan: NDFP peace consultants targets of Duterte’s bloodhounds

0

The brutal and grisly murders of peace consultant Randall Echanis and Louie Tagapia, a neighbor who just happened to be around, are recent indications of the surely-to-be-denied shoot-to-kill and take-no-prisoner policy of the Duterte government. Operation Tokhang has certainly gone beyond supposed drug users.

read more

‘Mabigat sa dibdib ko’

0

“Mabigat sa dibdib ko, nakita ko kasi ang anak ko. Kaya nananawagan po ako sa Supreme Court. Ibaba niyo po ang desisyon para makasama na niya ang anak niya.”

The post ‘Mabigat sa dibdib ko’ appeared first on Kodao Productions.

Joma: Only ‘butchers in authority’ may have killed Echanis

0

National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) chief political consultant Jose Maria Sison said the brutal murder of peace consultant and veteran agrarian reform activist Randall Echanis may only be the handiwork of “butchers in authority.”

The post Joma: Only ‘butchers in authority’ may have killed Echanis appeared first on Kodao Productions.

Assassination ‘akyat-bahay’ style

0

By: Ma. Ceres P. Doyo (Human Face column) – @inquirerdotnetPhilippine Daily Inquirer / August 13, 2020

Cliché though it sounds, the killing of Randall Echanis was the kind that ran chills down one’s spine. It did not look like most killings of political figures recorded on police blotters.

Terrified citizens have, by now, learned to use the words “riding in tandem” to describe hooded riders who finish off their targets with bullets — journalists, judges, politicians, even priests. The countless kills carried out by riding-in-tandem guns-for-hire have become commonplace, as in, so what’s new, except to the bereaved who are shocked beyond belief.

The way Echanis was killed baffles. It was not the kind that happens in dimly lit alleys or in street corners with karaoke joints where Sinatra wannabes are stabbed to death over a note gone awry.

Echanis was a political figure. I do not know him personally. I have not met him at all. I only know persons who are related to him by marriage, among them his spouse Linda, whom I had seen a few times in gatherings I had covered.

The killing of Echanis, a peace negotiator of the National Democratic Front, the umbrella group to which the armed New People’s Army and the Communist Party of the Philippines belong, is something out of the box. “A new modus,” a “new format,” said those who have yet to find words for it.

Last Tuesday’s Inquirer banner headline said: “Adviser to reds killed,” bylined Jodee A. Agoncillo, while the online version (inquirer.net) had more space for “Peace talks adviser to NDFP killed at home.” Both had the blurb: “Randall Echanis was stabbed in his apartment in the wee hours of Monday. He is the third consultant to the National Democratic Front of the Philippines to be killed, and the second under the present administration.”

Murder it definitely was, but no doubt also an assassination. The intent to kill was obvious. Assassination differs from murder in that the former has to do with the killing of a known figure and especially if politics played in it. Like the assassination of Ninoy Aquino.

If I may digress, years ago I interviewed and wrote about an assassin (“Confessions of a Hired Assassin,” Sunday Inquirer Magazine). That was before “riding-in-tandem” became the modus of choice. This killer simply fired away. The article is included in my book “Journalist in Her Country.” The assassin who admitted to so many kills was the half-brother of the head of the Philippine Air Force at that time. He arranged the interview and has since acknowledged their blood ties in his Facebook posts.

Whatever it is called — an assassination or a murder — the “akyat-bahay” (porch climbers) modus carried out on Echanis is shocking and worrisome. It was carried out in the wee hours by men who barged into a private abode. It did not look like a police raid, there was no arrest being effected. There was no firefight.

Echanis died of multiple stab wounds. It was an assassination by multiple stabbing. (Why do I suddenly recall President Duterte foggily talking about using bayonets? In this day and age.)

A neighbor who tried to check on the commotion going on in Echanis’ apartment was also killed. Echanis was not even a wanted man.

If the killing could be blamed on criminal elements, say burglars, if it was not a police operation, why did police operatives, giving strange reasons, seize Echanis’ body from the family’s choice of funeral parlor and transfer it to the police’s choice of funeral parlor? Confirmation of true identity needed, police said. The saying “dead men tell no tales” may not apply in the case of Echanis.

And what do you know, a paralegal who was at the vigil was arrested.

Government spokesperson Harry Roque warned against blaming the government for Echanis’ death, saying that those from the anti-government left have also been known to kill one another or something to that effect.

The recently signed anti-terrorism law that has earned a record 27 groups filing petitions against it with the Supreme Court is feared to become an aid to warrantless arrests and other government operations against citizens suspected to be shaking the status quo.

The way Echanis was killed spoke loud and clear. Who had him killed? Why in akyat-bahay style?