On May 30, Mayor Victorio Palangdan ordered the total lockdown of Barangay Ucab, Itogon in Benguet province. The measure came after a 40-year-old male from Ucab Proper tested positive for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
“The initial report is that he is a Jail Officer from New Bilibid Prison, Manila, who initially tested negative from rapid testing before going home to Itogon. Positive COVID 19 swab test result just came in today from RITM,” the mayor said on his Facebook last May 29.
The mayor lifted the lockdown after completing the contact tracing and return of negative test results of the individuals.
A test that resulted in a false negative threatened the mining town. However, this is not an isolated case. The social media is also teeming with personal narratives of the anxiety and financial issues that came from false-positive results of the rapid antibody test (RAT).
One of these accounts is about a 46-year-old female from Taguig City. She went to the hospital for dialysis, but because of the pleural effusion and pneumonia, the hospital conducted RAT on May 6. The rapid test yielded a positive result, and the hospital admitted her as a probable COVID-19 case. Medical personnel took swab samples on May 8, and the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine received the specimen the following day. The result of the confirmatory test came back on May 15 and turned out negative.
The hospital treated her as a probable COVID-19 case, and the bill reached P441, 506. The lengthy period it took before the result confirmatory test came out compounded the situation and anxiety the patient felt.
In both cases, the rapid test played a crucial role.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are two kinds of rapid test kits marketed by pharmaceutical companies: one that detects viral protein (antigen) and the other identifies antibodies. The quick antibody test is the more common kind and currently in use in the Philippines.
RAT kits determine the presence of antibodies – the immunoglobulin M (IgM) and the immunoglobulin G (IgG). The IgM is the body’s immune system’s response to the onset of infection, while IgG is the reaction from previous infection.
The test requires a blood sample from the patient. Results are available in 15 to 45 minutes, depending on the type of RAT used. Recently, Baguio City subjected the personnel of the City Public Information Office and some media members to RAT. The results came out in 10 minutes.
Compared to using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the “gold standard” for COVID-19 confirmation, RAT is cheaper. With the limited testing capacity of the country using RT-PCR, results can also take at least 24 hours.
Unreliable, waste of resources
However, the test is not reliable. This fact is why many members of the medical community advised against its use in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dr. Gene Nisperos, co-convener of Cure COVID, pointed out that RAT has a 40-50% chance of arriving at a false negative result and 30-40% false positive. According to him, “rapid test brings unnecessary anxiety or complacency depending on the result.”
He also noted that those tested positive with RAT are still required to take the confirmatory RT-PCR test.
“Doing this would only double their expenses,” he said.
Nisperos said that people should be cautious of some sectors pushing for their definite agenda in using RAT kits. The doctor said utilizing rapid test to determine those who are fit work is unsafe.
“Malaking peligro ang nais nilang gawin. Gusto nila ng dahilan para masabing okay nang lumabas at pumasok ulit sa trabaho, kung rapid test kits ang gagamitin para dito, niloloko lang nila ang mga tao,” he added.
Cure COVID is a network of medical professionals, personalities, and organizations advocating a comprehensive socio-economic response to the current health crisis, including mass testing.
In an online press briefing organized by the Action for Economic Reforms, several medical societies in the country expressed the same concerns. In particular, the group opposed the use of the mandatory rapid test for workers.
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (PSMID) president Dr. Marissa M. Alejandria said RAT in asymptomatic individuals “has no added value to be used as a requirement to acquire the return-to-work clearance.”
“Only for research setting”
In its advisory dated April 8, WHO said that “based on current evidence, [it] recommends the use of these new point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests only in research settings.”
“They should not be used in any other setting, including for clinical decision-making, until evidence supporting use for specific indications is available,” it added.
Despite the advisory and the absence of clear guidelines from the DOH for RAT, President Rodrigo Duterte ordered the procurement of rapid test kits on April 13, late-night public address. Secretary Carlito Glavez, Jr., the Chief Implementer of the Philippines’ Declared National Policy Against the COVID-19, said the government plans to acquire around 2 million RAT kits.
Before the president’s announcement, the Department of Health said they do not recommend the use of the diagnostic kit during a Laging Handa briefing on March 23.
“Ang ating rapid test kits hindi nirerekomenda ng DOH na gamitin natin ito (DOH does not recommend rapid test kits for use),” said Health Undersecretary Maria Rosario Vergeire.
In his May 21 visit to Baguio City, Galvez announced that the government would use the RAT to compliment the current RT-PCR capacity of the country.
“Those doctors who say that the rapid test is not good, I believe, are wrong,” he said.
According to him, the National Task Force Against COVID-19 already purchased 200,000 rapid test kits. He said the government intends to provide 2,500 to 5000 of these sets to the provinces, prioritizing areas without PCR testing capacity.
RATs for mass testing
In Northern Luzon, some of the local governments that utilized the RAT kits for screening were Ilocos Sur and Baguio City. Recently, Ilocos Norte and Cagayan also rolled out similar programs. They tested suspected COVID-19 patients, those working in the frontlines and areas with COVID-19 positive individuals.
Mayor Benjamin Magalong pushed for the conduct of rapid tests to fast-track contact tracing, isolation of suspected cases, and other medical measures. Private institutions donated most of the kits the city utilized for the mass rapid testing program.
Ilocos Sur launched its mass testing using rapid test kits in April, days after the province confirmed its first COVID-19 case on March 28. Like Baguio, the initiative came even before the DOH released the guidelines and ahead of the government’s promised mass testing program.
Provincial administrator Cara Tabios explained that RATs are for “screening and precautionary measure since the situation in the province remains manageable, with zero active cases at present.” (Phone happened days before the new COVID-19 case in the province)
According to her, the province adheres to its earlier pronouncement that the test serves as a “preliminary assessment tool” to identify individuals for isolation and further examination. She stressed that RT-PCR remains the confirmatory test.
One of the towns in Ilocos Sur, Santa, undertook “targeted mass screening” using the ARK Project protocol. ARK, a project initiated by the business sector, stands for Antibody Rapid test Kit. The municipality identified 2948 individuals for testing under the program. It allotted P4 million for the purchase of 5,000 pieces of rapid test kits (P800/kit).
The local government identified the following specific objectives:
- Detect, isolate, and treat those with an active infection (IgM+).
- Identify those already recovered and with likely immunity (IgG+).
- Use the test as a guide for tracing and monitoring active cases for appropriate interventions.
- Identify those fit to work.
Vice Mayor Jeremy Bueno said they are well aware of the limitations of RAT. Like the other LGU testing programs, the initiative is adjunct to the RT-PCR test.
“In the absence of mass testing in our region, the LGU decided that this is better than doing no testing at all,” he explained.
He added that the municipality is open for partnership. The vice mayor said that they are urging other LGUs in the province to pool their resources to establish an accredited testing center.
What is at stake?
Basing from the national government’s pronouncements, and the initiatives of local officials and the private sector, rapid testing will take a significant role as the community quarantine further eases this June.
In the absence of the government’s capacity to conduct extensive COVID-19 testing using RT-PCR, LGUs that want to ensure their constituents’ safety might turn to RAT. Their intention may be for the general welfare, but for the WHO and most medical societies, the use of unreliable tests remains a concern.
A false negative creates complacency; such is the case of the Ucab COVID-19 patient. Authorities may end up allowing a COVID-19 carrier to walk and further spread the infection. There is also a chance for those who test positive for the previous infection may assume that they developed an immunity.
Nisperos said there is no conclusive study yet that patients who acquired the disease cannot be infected again, nor is there a definite period of immunity.
Meanwhile, false-positive, as pointed out by Alejandria, could be a waste of medical and human resources. She stressed that false-positive would entail the unnecessary use of PPEs and PCR kits. It would also require the removal of a possible productive individual from the workforce and mobilization of personnel for the contact tracing.
False (positive or negative) results are sure to create harmful consequences and aggravate the situation. However, the more pressing concern is the assumption of some sections that RAT can stand as a basis for policies and decisions, like returning to work.
What should be the direction?
Doctors agree that strict implementation of minimum health standards remains the cheapest means to halt the spread of the disease. This includes the wearing of appropriate facemask, regular hand washing and disinfection, physical distancing, thermal scans, and symptoms check, and the 14-day quarantine.
However, with the continued rise of COVID-19 cases and easing of the restrictions, the medical community maintains the best defense is to strengthen the country’s capacity to detect and isolate infected persons and trace their contacts. The priorities include the testing of those regularly exposed to possible infection – the frontline healthcare workers and responders, and the vulnerable sectors and communities.
The government has started identifying and accrediting more testing centers. Last month, the DOH approved two independent testing centers in Northern Luzon. The testing centers are the Ilocos Training and Regional Medical Center for Region 1 and Cagayan Valley Center for Health Development GeneXpert Laboratory for Region 2. The facilities would unload the Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center and focus on testing specimens from the Cordillera Administrative Region.
As of May 29, the country has 43 DOH accredited testing centers. The recorded highest number of tests conducted in a day to date is on May 14, with 11,254 samples screened. These figures are still far from the targeted 30,000 daily tests and 78 testing labs by the end of May set by the IATF and DOH in April.
Joshua Danac of Scientists Unite Against COVID-19 in a virtual forum underscored that the need to “increase the RT-PCR testing capacity”. According to him, this requires not only the testing facility but also resolving the lack of personnel and necessary chemicals. He said that unreliable test has no place if the government makes the RT-PCR screening accessible and free for those who need it. Sherwin de Vera/nordis.net
The post RAPID TEST | Fast test results may create more harm than good appeared first on AlterMidya.