There’s more than enough money for all the COVID-19 response we
need – the Duterte administration just has to take the side of the people and
stop being so scared of the rich.
The Philippines is in the middle of its worst public health and
economic crisis in decades, possibly even in its history.
The social, economic and health measures needed to deal with this are
undoubtedly expensive. But are they unaffordable?
Hangin
The government seems to think so. The president famously said that
the government does not have enough money to respond – “hangin lang iyan,”
he lamented.
The rest of the Inter-Agency Task Force for the
Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases haven’t been as blunt but they’ve
been acting that way. The social welfare department has, in effect, been
rationing already stingy cash aid with unduly strict requirements. The health
department isn’t testing, tracing, isolating and treating as much people as
they should for want of resources.
The finance department is at the helm of the
government’s economic team. It is voting with its feet – its Philippine Program
for Recovery with Equity and Solidarity (PH-PROGRESO) and stimulus plans don’t give income
support for tens of millions of cash-strapped families beyond the lockdown.
Unfortunately, strangely affirming the
importance Karl Marx gives to the economic base of society, the economic
managers are too decisive. The finance department is also in charge of revenue
generation. If it says there isn’t any money, then the rest of government won’t
have any money. Which explains where the president’s hangin comment came
from.
But is there really no money to be had?
The plan
But before looking into that, a more basic question – how much
does the government really need? Four months into the pandemic, it’s still not
actually very clear. PH-PROGRESO is presumably the national government’s plan
but this doesn’t include what must also be considerable efforts at the local
government level.
The four-pillar PH-PROGRESO also has to be interpreted carefully
because the finance department adds up actual spending, loans and guarantees,
foregone revenue, financing, and additional liquidity to come up with an
impressive looking grand total of Php1.74 trillion.
As it is, it looks like there’s only Php506 billion in actual
spending. This includes Php321.6 billion in emergency support, Php133.7 billion
in loan and credit guarantees, and Php50.7 billion for health measures.
The balance of Php1.24 trillion is actually composed of tax cuts
and other foregone revenues (Php142.8 billion), liquidity released into the
system by central bank measures (Php233 billion), and financing mostly from new
debt (Php861.8 billion). Put another way, the government doesn’t actually need
to raise funds for all these items accounting for 71% of the ‘grand’ total.
So where to get that Php506 billion that will actually be spent?
The Php861.8 billion in new financing of PH-PROGRESO – Php436.9
billion from official development assistance (ODA) and Php419.4 billion from
government bonds – is presumably a source.
But the program also mentions up to Php673 billion freed up from
existing budget items and so not really needing new financing or revenue sources.
This is from the 2019 and 2020 national budgets, off-budget items from
government-owned and controlled corporations and government financial
institutions, and private sector contributions as well as from “financial
sector, monetary policy, regulatory relief”. In his last weekly report to
Congress, the president cited raising Php257 billion already from discontinued,
abandoned, reprogrammed, reallocated and realigned items in the 2019 and 2020
budgets.
Looked at in this way, it appears that the government has come up
with a reasonably prudent plan.
Poor pay for meager response
But appearances can be deceiving. There are two problems here.
The first is that the planned Php506 billion in actual spending
falls far short of being a sufficient response. The COVID-19 response needs to
be much more comprehensive and ambitious. The combined cost of the range of
health measures, emergency relief, income support, and enterprise support
needed is likely more in the order of Php1.5-2 trillion.
Clearly, the perceived lack of funds is a major binding constraint to the broader response that is really needed and, indeed, even just a larger COVID-19 response than at present. This self-imposed limitation gravely undermines the public health response, risks undue infections and deaths, and will mean socioeconomic difficulties on a massive scale.
Which leads to the second problem. Meager as the response is, the
poor are paying for it more than they should – through debt and higher taxes –
while the rich are paying much less than they can.
Most of the Php861.8 billion in financing of PH-PROGRESO is
actually new and additional debt that will be paid for from taxes. Only a tiny
Php404 million of this financing are grants and the rest are ODA loans and
government bonds. The government has already been reported as seeking US$5.7 billion in foreign loans for its COVID-19
response. To date, the finance department reports US$4.9
billion in COVID-related foreign debt.
The taxes to pay for this debt are disproportionately borne by the
poor with their low incomes. Especially after the Tax Reform for Acceleration
and Inclusion (TRAIN) Package 1 of 2017, the country’s tax system is more regressive and consumption tax-oriented than it
has ever been.
The self-imposed debt trap even to so-called development agencies
and friendly governments is glaring. The Duterte administration is programmed
to pay US$1.7 billion in debt service to multilateral
and bilateral agencies – especially the World Bank and Asian Development Bank –
this year. These are also the very agencies it has borrowed an additional US$2.5
billion from to respond to COVID-19.
Taxing consumption
The government is also quick to tax consumption including of the
poor. Consumption taxes are inherently regressive in being paid the same by
everyone regardless of how poor or rich they are – as opposed to direct
taxation of income and wealth which is more progressive.
The administration has already hiked tariffs on imported oil
products by 10% to raise funds for dealing with the pandemic.
The planning agency, headed by a former finance department official, is already
proposing higher consumption taxes that will add to the
burden of poor and middle class families.
This includes a digital economy value-added tax proposal which
adds a Php50 billion tax burden on online consumers over 2021-2023, higher
taxes on sweetened drinks and junk food adding a Php22.7 billion burden, and a
higher Motor Vehicle Road Users’ Tax adding a Php40 billion burden.
Increasing taxes on low-income families amid a recession would be
perplexing if the insensitivity of the Duterte administration and its economic
managers when it comes to taxes were not already well-established. They are
only being hugely opportunistic in exploiting the COVID-19 crisis to push their
long-standing TRAIN agenda of raising consumption taxes on poor and low-income
groups while reducing taxes on the rich.
It’s all a bizarre repeat of TRAIN where the poor are made to pay
more so the rich can pay less. This time around, amid the COVID-19 crisis, the
rich will benefit from the biggest corporate tax break in Philippine history.
TRAIN Package 2, comically renamed Tax Reform for Attracting Better and High-Quality Opportunities
(TRABAHO) bill, soberly renamed the Corporate Income Tax and Incentives
Reform Act (CITIRA), and now opportunistically renamed the Corporate Recovery
and Tax Incentives for Enterprises Act (CREATE), is being primed for rapid
legislative passage. The Duterte administration is giving up Php667 billion in potential COVID-19 response
funds to boost corporate profits.
Tax the rich
So where can funds for the comprehensive COVID-19 response needed
come from? From the very same sources that funding for national development
should come from – the accumulated wealth and income of the rich.
The pandemic has seen the ideas of solidarity, unity and
compassion raised repeatedly. Beyond spontaneous acts of charity, paying higher
taxes is putting money where your mouth is.
In our population of 108 million, an estimated 596 Filipinos each have wealth of some Php2.5 billion pesos or more. This includes the 50 richest Filipinos whose combined wealth of around Php4.1 trillion is, by IBON’s estimates, more than what the poorest 71 million Filipinos own combined.
There’s no reasonable argument that taxing their wealth above Php1
billion will adversely affect their well-being and welfare. A wealth tax of 1% on wealth above Php1 billion, another 2%
above Php2 billion, and another 3% above Php3 billion will raise Php236.7
billion annually from these 50 richest alone. They are not going to be spending
this anyway versus the huge social, economic and health returns from
using this for COVID-19 response.
Other tax measures can also be considered. A two-tiered corporate
income tax scheme with higher taxes on large firms and lower taxes on micro,
small and medium enterprises can be designed to generate about Php70 billion
annually. Similarly, a personal income tax scheme with higher taxes on just the
richest 2.5% of Filipino families can raise about Php127 billion annually.
These are illustrative figures for now but the Duterte administration can come up with more precise figures if it was so inclined. There are technical challenges but these are not insurmountable and no reason not to try.
A wealth tax, higher taxes on large corporations, and higher taxes on the richest Filipinos are the most rational sources of revenues for COVID-19 response and development.
Does Congress have the political will for these? Sadly, our senators and representatives, looking to the 2022 elections already, are the biggest political won’t.
